Dr. Bogantes
Sistema integumentario:
http://www.4shared.com/file/88741301/9488a875/Sistema_integumentario.html
Sistema nervioso:
http://www.4shared.com/file/88790873/79be13ab/Generalidades_del_SNC.html
martes, 24 de febrero de 2009
viernes, 20 de febrero de 2009
audios anato
18 febrero.
Dr. Guevara
http://www.4shared.com/file/88586851/f045c762/Cortes_ejes_y_localizacion.html
Dr. Vargas Dr. Bogantes
http://www.4shared.com/file/88586532/37cea20d/Sist_seo_y_sist_integumentario.html
Dr. Guevara
http://www.4shared.com/file/88586851/f045c762/Cortes_ejes_y_localizacion.html
Dr. Vargas Dr. Bogantes
http://www.4shared.com/file/88586532/37cea20d/Sist_seo_y_sist_integumentario.html
miércoles, 18 de febrero de 2009
examenes de embrio e histo
estan el la carpeta 15 de mil copias cortesia d ana maria la mas guapa del mundo.
acuerdense de pegarse la leida de lo de histo, del ross, cap 2, cap 5 112-145 y cap6 177-181.
los articulos apenas los tenga en mis manos los subo
acuerdense de pegarse la leida de lo de histo, del ross, cap 2, cap 5 112-145 y cap6 177-181.
los articulos apenas los tenga en mis manos los subo
miércoles, 11 de febrero de 2009
clase embrio grabaciones
audios gracias a Jonathan.
clase dr zamora. implantacion y embrion bilaminar. 11 de febrero
http://www.4shared.com/file/87249771/bff15fdb/REC003.html
clase dr zamora. De_embrion_bilaminar_a_trilaminar.
http://www.4shared.com/file/87880080/5342e4ea/De_embrion_bilaminar_a_trilaminar.html
clase dr zamora. implantacion y embrion bilaminar. 11 de febrero
http://www.4shared.com/file/87249771/bff15fdb/REC003.html
clase dr zamora. De_embrion_bilaminar_a_trilaminar.
http://www.4shared.com/file/87880080/5342e4ea/De_embrion_bilaminar_a_trilaminar.html
clase dr campos. bases desarrollo embrionario.
http://www.4shared.com/file/88040862/f237e675/bases_del_desarrollo_embrionario.html
viernes, 9 de enero de 2009
noticias de la escuela
fechas que han dado:
ultima semana de enero resultados de la matricula
inicio de lecciones a los de I semestre segundo anio: 9 de febrero.
ultima semana de enero resultados de la matricula
inicio de lecciones a los de I semestre segundo anio: 9 de febrero.
domingo, 28 de diciembre de 2008
Misheard lyrics de sean paul
Videillos q estan cague de risa:
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=nfXke_z6t3I
Misheard Lyrics - Sean Paul - Temperature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2JoxdPgVE0
Misheard Lyrics - Sean Paul 'Gimme da' Light'
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=nfXke_z6t3I
Misheard Lyrics - Sean Paul - Temperature
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2JoxdPgVE0
Misheard Lyrics - Sean Paul 'Gimme da' Light'
miércoles, 17 de diciembre de 2008
Surveying the Sex Lives of Medical Students
Posted 05/14/2008
Alan W. Shindel, MDAuthor Information
The 20s are a peak period of sexual activity in many people's lives. For most aspiring physicians, this period coincides with their medical training. However, little is known about the sexual attitudes and activities of medical students.
What we do know is that medical school is a rigorous process known to take a psychological and emotional toll on physicians in training. Despite growing attention to their well-being, it is clear that medical school can be a stressful experience.[1] Medical trainees who are in committed sexual relationships must also contend with balancing their partners' needs against the demands of their educational program.[2]
A recent study of sexual function in Chinese medical students provided some interesting data on medical student sexuality in that country,[3] but the last peer-reviewed reports on sexual dysfunction in US medical students were published decades ago. In 1967, Woods and Natterson reported that 22 of 40 male medical students had some concerns about their sexual potency.[4] However, social mores and the demographic characteristics of medical students are radically different now, and it is unclear whether those findings are still applicable.
On the basis of my own recollections of medical training, I was intrigued to investigate the sexual behaviors and incidence of sexual problems in contemporary medical students. Our research team conducted a pilot study of sexual dysfunction among medical students enrolled at Washington University in Saint Louis, Missouri.
The survey consisted of a basic demographic questionnaire coupled with validated instruments for the assessment of human sexuality: For male participants, we used the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Self Esteem and Relationship Quality survey (SEAR), and the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE); for female participants, we used the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Index of Sex Life (ISL).
The study group included 54 men and 78 women. The group's self-reported sexual history was generally similar to age-matched normative data (eg, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, intercourse frequency).[5,6]
Although sexual behaviors in our study population were similar to existing normative data from an age-matched population, male medical students reported a higher incidence of erectile dysfunction (roughly 30%) compared with normative data (estimated at 7% among US men 18-29 years old). However, the incidence of other sexual problems in men, such as premature ejaculation, was similar to normative data.[7]
Our data revealed a high frequency of sexual problems among female students as well: 63% were at "high risk" for sexual dysfunction on the basis of validated FSFI cutoff scores. The most prevalent problems were low scores in the areas of "desire," "orgasm," and "pain." When compared with normative data, orgasm and pain complaints were more prevalent in the study group, although the incidence of low sexual desire was similar to that of an age-matched population.[7] In addition, 42% of the female medical students reported interference in their sexual life from "excessive tiredness," and more than one third blamed interference on a "lack of sexual partner" or "psychological stress."
Being in a relationship correlated with better sexual function scores in both male and female medical students, and relationship quality (as assessed by the SEAR tool in men and the ISL measure in women) was highly predictive of overall sexual satisfaction.
The results of this study were published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine.[8] Although these pilot data are intriguing, we are reluctant to generalize them to the larger medical student population, due to the small sample size and limitations of a single-institution study group. Furthermore, the normative data used for comparison purposes did not represent a true control group, because the data were derived from a questionnaire with single-item, Likert-style questions. Most importantly, our pilot study did not include a measure to assess personal distress related to sexual function, which is a key criterion for the clinical diagnosis of a true sexual problem.
In order to obtain more definitive data, we are now conducting a survey of stress, sexuality, and sexual dysfunction in students enrolled at allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in North America. Approval for this study has been obtained from the Committee for Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco. Support and endorsement of this study have been obtained from the American Medical Student Association and are being sought from the Sexual Medicine Society of North America.
This current survey is a marked improvement over the pilot project. We are using the same validated survey tools that were used in the pilot study, but have made subtle modifications to improve their applicability to sexual minority groups. In addition to the sex-specific instruments, we have included 2 validated instruments for the assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms; these instruments will provide interesting data in their own right and may reveal intriguing relationships with the sexuality-specific instruments. We have expanded the survey to include new questions on sexual experiences, personal stress related to sexual function, and comfort in dealing with sexuality issues in clinical practice.
The research team on this new project includes a number of outstanding collaborators from a variety of research backgrounds. Dr. Christian J. Nelson, PhD, is a clinical psychologist from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, who has substantial experience dealing with the psychological aspects of sexuality. Kathryn Ando, PhD (c), is a sexologist from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, California. Dr. Ando's expertise in sexological research complements the clinical perspective of the other team members and will add a new dimension to our analysis of the results. Finally, Tom F. Lue, MD, is a world-renowned expert and pioneer in the field of men's sexual health. He has served as mentor and advisor for this project. The diverse backgrounds of the research team members have already enhanced the design of the survey, and we are confident that the variety of perspectives that are brought to the table by this team will lead to very interesting analyses of our data set.
It is our hope to accurately assess stress, sexuality, and the incidence of sexual problems in this population to answer an interesting, unanswered academic question. Furthermore, we hope to increase awareness of the importance of sexuality as an important component of quality of life in the medical school population. Increased awareness will hopefully make it easier for medical students with sexual concerns to feel more comfortable addressing these issues and seeking assistance for any problems that they might be experiencing. With improved understanding and awareness, we are optimistic that our results may help improve medical student quality of life.
Students who are currently enrolled in an allopathic or osteopathic medical school are invited to take the survey if they have not already done so. The survey may be accessed at https://www.questionpro.com/akira/TakeSurvey?id=857308.
General questions about this research project may be directed to Alan W. Shindel, MD, the principal investigator, at shindela@urology.ucsf.edu .
Alan W. Shindel, MDAuthor Information
The 20s are a peak period of sexual activity in many people's lives. For most aspiring physicians, this period coincides with their medical training. However, little is known about the sexual attitudes and activities of medical students.
What we do know is that medical school is a rigorous process known to take a psychological and emotional toll on physicians in training. Despite growing attention to their well-being, it is clear that medical school can be a stressful experience.[1] Medical trainees who are in committed sexual relationships must also contend with balancing their partners' needs against the demands of their educational program.[2]
A recent study of sexual function in Chinese medical students provided some interesting data on medical student sexuality in that country,[3] but the last peer-reviewed reports on sexual dysfunction in US medical students were published decades ago. In 1967, Woods and Natterson reported that 22 of 40 male medical students had some concerns about their sexual potency.[4] However, social mores and the demographic characteristics of medical students are radically different now, and it is unclear whether those findings are still applicable.
On the basis of my own recollections of medical training, I was intrigued to investigate the sexual behaviors and incidence of sexual problems in contemporary medical students. Our research team conducted a pilot study of sexual dysfunction among medical students enrolled at Washington University in Saint Louis, Missouri.
The survey consisted of a basic demographic questionnaire coupled with validated instruments for the assessment of human sexuality: For male participants, we used the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Self Esteem and Relationship Quality survey (SEAR), and the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE); for female participants, we used the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Index of Sex Life (ISL).
The study group included 54 men and 78 women. The group's self-reported sexual history was generally similar to age-matched normative data (eg, age at first intercourse, number of sexual partners, intercourse frequency).[5,6]
Although sexual behaviors in our study population were similar to existing normative data from an age-matched population, male medical students reported a higher incidence of erectile dysfunction (roughly 30%) compared with normative data (estimated at 7% among US men 18-29 years old). However, the incidence of other sexual problems in men, such as premature ejaculation, was similar to normative data.[7]
Our data revealed a high frequency of sexual problems among female students as well: 63% were at "high risk" for sexual dysfunction on the basis of validated FSFI cutoff scores. The most prevalent problems were low scores in the areas of "desire," "orgasm," and "pain." When compared with normative data, orgasm and pain complaints were more prevalent in the study group, although the incidence of low sexual desire was similar to that of an age-matched population.[7] In addition, 42% of the female medical students reported interference in their sexual life from "excessive tiredness," and more than one third blamed interference on a "lack of sexual partner" or "psychological stress."
Being in a relationship correlated with better sexual function scores in both male and female medical students, and relationship quality (as assessed by the SEAR tool in men and the ISL measure in women) was highly predictive of overall sexual satisfaction.
The results of this study were published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine.[8] Although these pilot data are intriguing, we are reluctant to generalize them to the larger medical student population, due to the small sample size and limitations of a single-institution study group. Furthermore, the normative data used for comparison purposes did not represent a true control group, because the data were derived from a questionnaire with single-item, Likert-style questions. Most importantly, our pilot study did not include a measure to assess personal distress related to sexual function, which is a key criterion for the clinical diagnosis of a true sexual problem.
In order to obtain more definitive data, we are now conducting a survey of stress, sexuality, and sexual dysfunction in students enrolled at allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in North America. Approval for this study has been obtained from the Committee for Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco. Support and endorsement of this study have been obtained from the American Medical Student Association and are being sought from the Sexual Medicine Society of North America.
This current survey is a marked improvement over the pilot project. We are using the same validated survey tools that were used in the pilot study, but have made subtle modifications to improve their applicability to sexual minority groups. In addition to the sex-specific instruments, we have included 2 validated instruments for the assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms; these instruments will provide interesting data in their own right and may reveal intriguing relationships with the sexuality-specific instruments. We have expanded the survey to include new questions on sexual experiences, personal stress related to sexual function, and comfort in dealing with sexuality issues in clinical practice.
The research team on this new project includes a number of outstanding collaborators from a variety of research backgrounds. Dr. Christian J. Nelson, PhD, is a clinical psychologist from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, who has substantial experience dealing with the psychological aspects of sexuality. Kathryn Ando, PhD (c), is a sexologist from the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco, California. Dr. Ando's expertise in sexological research complements the clinical perspective of the other team members and will add a new dimension to our analysis of the results. Finally, Tom F. Lue, MD, is a world-renowned expert and pioneer in the field of men's sexual health. He has served as mentor and advisor for this project. The diverse backgrounds of the research team members have already enhanced the design of the survey, and we are confident that the variety of perspectives that are brought to the table by this team will lead to very interesting analyses of our data set.
It is our hope to accurately assess stress, sexuality, and the incidence of sexual problems in this population to answer an interesting, unanswered academic question. Furthermore, we hope to increase awareness of the importance of sexuality as an important component of quality of life in the medical school population. Increased awareness will hopefully make it easier for medical students with sexual concerns to feel more comfortable addressing these issues and seeking assistance for any problems that they might be experiencing. With improved understanding and awareness, we are optimistic that our results may help improve medical student quality of life.
Students who are currently enrolled in an allopathic or osteopathic medical school are invited to take the survey if they have not already done so. The survey may be accessed at https://www.questionpro.com/akira/TakeSurvey?id=857308.
General questions about this research project may be directed to Alan W. Shindel, MD, the principal investigator, at shindela@urology.ucsf.edu .
sábado, 22 de noviembre de 2008
resumenes de todo
http://www.4shared.com/file/72728596/50bb0de5/resumenes.html
aca estan los resumenes de toda la materia de bioqui
aca estan los resumenes de toda la materia de bioqui
domingo, 16 de noviembre de 2008
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)